🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.